The Rise of Socially Responsible Businesses in the USA

Article 39 of the Charter restates the TFEU's enumerated rights of Article 20(2)(d) and 22(2). The provision guarantees European Parliament both active and passive suffrage. The second paragraph line up with Article 14(3) of the TFEU. Candidates cannot so be unfairly excluded depending on theirThe relevance of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights was evaluated in this paper using political and legal analysis in order to enhance the democratic legitimacy of the European Union. Comprehensive study of the way the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights improves the democratic legitimacy of the European Union is lacking. This study thus aimed to close the disparity by concentrating on particular Charter clauses meant to support participatory democracy and a deeper interaction between the people and the European Union.

 The Right to Participate as a Candidate at European Parliament Elections

Particularly considering recent rulings of national constitutional courts and their consequences for the function of the European Court of Justice, the study also investigated the legal challenges and complexity surrounding the interpretation, application, and balance of fundamental rights in the European Union. The study seeks to pinpoint possible advantages of the Charter, such enhancing the link between the EU and its people and so boosting the European Union's legal system and legitimacy by so defending people's fundamental rights.Leaders decided to draft a new instrument known as the Charter of Fundamental Rights (Charter) during the Summit in Cologne on June 3 and 4, 1999. The event attained a political consensus on the protection of fundamental rights as one of the fundamental principles of the European Union and the essential precondition for strengthening of democratic legitimacy. The aim is to properly show the relevance of fundamental rights to the citizens of the European Union (EU).The Charter seeks to enhance the EU's legal system and legitimacy as well as to mend the rapport between the EU and its people. It guarantees the protection of the basic liberties of the people. 

Conversely, the Charter brings the EU and its people closer, therefore reflecting the objectives of a political system.

It seems like a way to constitutionalize the EU. So opens the path for a politicalunion.3 Some writers assert that subjective rights are the foundation of modern nations. Furthermore, given that the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) guarantees the fundamental rights, the potential of the Charter, as part of the Treaty of Lisbon, is fascinating in regard of its legal consequences. The basic liberties cannot depend on court oversight. By means of the Treaty of Lisbon, the Charter replaced national laws and hence the direct influence of its provisions on the national level legal systems. This calls for proactive institutions to "promote" and to "fulfill" human rights commitments. Nonetheless, a thorough thinking is of great importance depending on the observance of fundamental rights to guarantee the legitimacy of the ECJ as the EU tribunal of fundamental rights. Recent decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany indicate that the issues raised by the ECJ in 1969 were warranted. Some writers saw the two historic decisions from 2019 as means of opposition against the European Court's influence as the court that evaluates fundamental rights; hence, they aimed to minimize its significance by stressing that its involvement is superfluous in cases discussed at the level of Germany.9 The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany adopted the EU fundamental rights as a standard for case evaluations and set up the concept of parallel application of the EU and domestic fundamental rights in areas that are not yet fully harmonized with the EU law.9 Some writers interpreted the Constitutional Court verdicts as forms of resistance against the European Court's role as the court that assesses fundamental rights; and national level.10 It is noteworthy that other EU members' constitutional courts adopted the approach of basing a case review on the acceptance of the EU basic rights. 

Some of them accomplished even before to Germany's Constitutional Court.

Handling legal disputes concerning EU fundamental rights depends critically on the ECJ. Acting as the highest interpreter and enforcer of EU legislation, it guarantees that member states and EU institutions follow basic liberties and preserve the required harmonization. This position, though, comes with delicate and complicated questions. The complexity stands out as the ECJ is facing major legal challenges related to the interpretation, application, and balancing of the fundamental rights throughout the Union. This is related to the continuous debate on strengthening democratic legitimacy in the EU’s institutional architecture, particularly the ECJ.  Based on the contents, human rights in the fifth chapter hold especially importance. The Chapter shows certain civil rights in a way that influences the situation of EU people. As supranational construct, they are members of the Union. It enhances citizens' emotions and drives them to turn to the Union since it gives the Court of Justice of the EU the power to decide on matters of fundamental rights. It shows that the Union and its people are "getting closer" and finally helps to validate the Union.